I could feel the sweat beading up along my hairline as I stood before Ms. Giles for my oral book report. It was my 7th grade English class. I had selected Madeleine L’Engle’s A Ring of Endless Light for that quarter’s reading, but I hadn’t read it. I just couldn’t get into it. I had, however, skimmed enough of the book that I was sure I could fake my oral report.
Unfortunately, A Ring of Endless Light just happened to be Ms. Giles’s favorite book, so my oral report was an abject failure. What’s worse, she caught me in my attempt to lie my way through the oral report.
It’s funny how something that happened more than 30 years ago is still a defining moment in my life. Thinking back on the discomfort of that moment, even now, creates a small pit in my stomach. It helped me recognize that lying was definitely not for me.
Does that mean I’m the absolute paragon of truth-telling? Well, I do my best not to lie, and have been known to correct myself when I’ve intentionally (or otherwise) misled someone.
But, like I said, not perfect.
I’ll admit, when I first heard the term “intellectual honesty” I had to stop and think about what it really means.
An academic definition — one I quite like — is that intellectual honesty is the practice of being truthful and transparent in your thinking, admitting what you don’t know, acknowledging biases, and valuing truth over personal gain, ego, or convenience.
Here’s what intellectual honesty isn’t:
- Pretending to know things you don’t (like my younger self did).
- Cherry-picking evidence to fit your narrative.
- Ignoring facts that challenge your views.
- Misrepresenting information to manipulate others or bolster your own position.
- Letting emotions override reason when forming opinions or making decisions.
Everywhere we look, there are vibrant examples of what intellectual honesty isn’t. The world is noisy and people want to be seen and heard. It’s an innate human desire to feel important and valued.
I learned to love reading in Ms. Giles’s class. During that oral book report, fear was my primary motivator, not that I really wanted to lie to her or admit that I had been lazy about my reading. I was afraid of being judged for not finishing the book, for not being prepared, and, ironically, for failing. I’m sure I didn’t think about it these terms then, but fear made it easier to rationalize my behavior: I could just pretend to know the material.
And that’s what makes intellectual honesty so hard. We don’t want to look stupid or incompetent, we want to protect (even expand) our egos, and we’re naturally drawn to confirm our own biases. Intellectual honesty requires admitting things that might make us feel vulnerable. In my case, I would have to admit to Ms. Giles that I didn’t finish the book. I had a reputation as a good student and a reader to protect!
As I stood there fumbling through the report I wasn’t prepared for, caught by one of my favorite teachers, irony won the day. My fear of being judged led to the exact outcome I was trying to avoid — because intellectual dishonesty tends to unravel under scrutiny.
Intellectual honesty requires a moral compass because it’s based in integrity. It’s not just about admitting what you don’t know. It’s also about pursuing truth from a vantage point that values respect, humility, and accountability. Without that foundation, intellectual honesty doesn’t have much of a footing and generally falls apart under the pressures of ego and convenience.
When I tried to fake my book report, the discomfort wasn’t just in getting caught. I don’t recall my twelve year old self having a clear list of personal values, but lying, I knew, violated something I valued, even if I hadn’t defined the value. Retrospectively, I can see that intellectual honesty is as much about character as it is facts, maybe more.
Grounded in integrity, intellectual honesty builds trust, facilitates growth, and keeps us aligned with what matters. It’s not easy, but it’s always worth it.
Intellectual honesty isn’t about being perfect but it is about owning up when we don’t take the high road. That’s why it’s okay to admit when you don’t know something — even though we live in a world where it appears that everyone wants to be the “foremost expert” on something.
There’s a lot of growth to be found in intellectual honesty because it encourages seeking out evidence that challenges your views. When was the last time you set out to prove yourself wrong about something?
This article itself was an exercise in intellectual honesty. Before I started, I had only heard the term “intellectual honesty” one time. Intellectual honesty is about exploring what you don’t know with the goal of learning and sharing truth.
I remember admitting to Ms. Giles that I didn’t read A Ring of Endless Light. I’m pretty sure I even cried standing there next to her desk. Ms. Giles took pity on me and gave me a chance to go back and read the book and report to her a few weeks later.
I read the book from cover to cover with wrapt attention. I knew the story well the next time I gave my oral report to her. Despite my failed first attempt, I think she even gave me a decent grade the second time around.
No comments:
Post a Comment